oreo chocostix
note the strong little NYCE, bravely holding up the big new product. note also the 2 photos, one shot w/ light, the other w/out. feel free to cast a vote. anyhow, Oreo ChocoStix just arrived in plano tx but it turns out they're only semi-new (been out in australia a while; intro'd here in late oct). it's a choc-coated choc wafer w/ layers of choc & white "cream". you'd think they'd be an automatic 10, esp if you like wafers (which of course you should). but you know what? they're not all that. the proposition is that you get the oreo flavor in a wafer format. well, it's most definitely a wafer, but no sign of the "oreo flavor". i think the problem may be the choc coating. it tastes neither like choc nor oreo nor anything other than "wax"
posted by TG @ 10:45 AM
5 comments
5 Comments:
Shooting's too good for 'em. Chocolate covered oreos should be a no brainer.
With light. It reminds me of Guantanamo in the morning.
I vote for total darkness in the case of any further pics involving female weight lifters. Except and unless Jessica Alba, or my wife, are doing the heavy lifting.
Natural light is good... the flash simply shows that you need cleaner pennies... ;-)
Bought the Nutter Butter version of these and was disappointed with them. The peanut butter taste was very light. It's like the chocolate sucks the PB flavor out of it.
Dickie, have you seen next month's proposed cover of Texas Monthly?
Post a Comment
<< Home